At our regional (Awana GP) We had a 30' Best for one group and a 30' Microwizard for another.
Times on a Best are always a little slower (2.53x vs 2.63x) due to the slope etc. of the track.
One car ran consistent 2.53x times on the MW and was 2.75x or worse on the BT. Naturally the parent and child were not happy as on one track it was #1 or #2 in the age group and on the other it was #4 or #5 against the same cars. The car was very well prepared.
I do know that the BT was rather rough and in need of some TLC.
My only rationale is that the car was built low to the track and the rear may have rubbed coming out of the curve section, however it didn't show any marks.
Any thoughts as to the disparity?
Times on a Best are always a little slower (2.53x vs 2.63x) due to the slope etc. of the track.
One car ran consistent 2.53x times on the MW and was 2.75x or worse on the BT. Naturally the parent and child were not happy as on one track it was #1 or #2 in the age group and on the other it was #4 or #5 against the same cars. The car was very well prepared.
I do know that the BT was rather rough and in need of some TLC.
My only rationale is that the car was built low to the track and the rear may have rubbed coming out of the curve section, however it didn't show any marks.
Any thoughts as to the disparity?