What a .010 loss looks like

[zeebzob]

Short SloMo vid of a few runs. Thanks to tmeyer for the fast test car. I provided the slow one...LOL
Enjoy

[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1LZf49Ke6k&feature=youtu.be[/video]

 

[GravityX]

Cool video, when looking at it like that .010 seconds looks forever. In real time, it's kind of hard to see.

2.964 vs. 2.974 some quick cars. What do these times translate over to on John's track?

 

[zeebzob]

I think my track is pretty much dead nuts to John's. When I got my car back, it ran exactly what it did in Utah. I had to adjust my wheel gaps, then it was back to what I was getting before I sent...stupid USPS. LOL
At Johns in the November race, tmeyer ran 2.965, 2.966, 2.965 and 2.966.

 

[IAE Racing]

Wow. Thanks zeeb!

 

[zeebzob]

One other thing to note: Based off the SS Pro average times in November, if the 2.964 would have been 1st, the 2.974 would have been 28th!

 

[GravityX]

One other thing to note: Based off the SS Pro average times in November, if the 2.964 would have been 1st, the 2.974 would have been 28th!

It's tight racing without a doubt, if 28 spots are only separated by 1/100th of a second from 1st to 28th. What is fun for me is to go back and review races from just about a year ago. Look how far and fast the times have changes in such a short period of time.

Not sure we'd be at this level of speed without some of John's products and dedication to this hobby. Along with many other racers here providing the useful tips.

 

[quadad]

I LOVE that Sony camera Andy. Just don't like it when it shows wiggles in any of my cars ! Way to go Zeebzob Speed Shop !!

 

[Cramjet]

There are a lot of wiggles on this one. Sorry, it's my phone. But this was a win against the second fastest car at districts last year. It's a 1/1000th second win.

https://youtu.be/z__fUIW2fzU

 

[Jimmiet99]

And people wonder why I was so disappointed when my son's car missed the finals in qualified scout by .0012