Best track TLC

Rocket car

0
Pro Racer
Jan 1, 2013
1,238
24
38
12
Algonquin for the"good land". Wayne's World
Our track has been used for scout racing for 5 years now and nobody has ever cleaned it. It has alot of graphite on it and i would like to run my pro cars on it , but I'm scared too. What are the best products to remove graphite from the aluminum??

After cleaning I will maintain it with pledge.
 
Been there! Pledge works great in the lower sections. It won't cut in the upper start section though. We used simple green this year and that cut through it 99%. I've used olive oil to cut the graphite grime off of cars, never tried it on the track.
 
Oh Kinser!- you just triggered an automatic story from my old brain with the term "Hydrogen embrittlement" Many years ago they had a big photo op with the Governor of Iowa driving off in a new Chrysler with one of the first catalytic converters. He went barreling down an old road between the large dry cornfields while everyone clapped. Then the car backfired, and the exploding gas blew the converter into hot parts that caught both sides of the road on fire. Luckily no one was injured. Every company that had a part on that car got it back to do testing on to see if they were the problem. Everyone sent back a report that they were not the problem. And at the time, I was sure I wasn't the problem either- the ignition device I made worked just fine. The converter had other problems that kept the cornfield fire off the radar, but as the months went by with no obvious cause we were all asked to study the problem again. I put the part through some military type vibration testing and oops- the device was intermittent. As soon as the part was still, it passed any test- but if it got a shake just right, it would go open for a while and then start to work again. Just like turning off the engine, coasting a bit and turning it back on to get a nice backfire ( we are talking 1975 or so). The metalization on the semiconductor had layers of titanium, tungsten, and nickle. They found hydrogen embrittlement in the layers causing them to give up adhesion and go intermittent. ( and probably caused the backfire) We had to put in a super hard test for adhesion { Duck Tape- I kid you not}, and we scrapped out the contaminated metal slugs we used. I took them all home and later used the tungsten to put in our first car in 1976. When we asked if turning off the ignition, coasting and then turning it back on would blow it up, They were sure it would even it it never came back on because if a chug of gas got into that 900 degree converter- trouble. Back to the drawing board for them also.
 
Rocket car said:
zeebzob said:
If its really bad and has some scratches, just use a metal polish like Mothers. Its a pain in the @$$ but the surface will worthy of your pro cars

This one is going to need some abrasive to make it shine like yours.

Paul I think that will fill in the scratches. I might need little of both.

Thx guys

Ok, I buffed 1 lane of the 4 lane best track. 2 HOURS LATER it shines like zeebzob's track. Just 6 more hours of buffing and it will all look like new. I now have a greater appreciation for how nice zeebzob's and John's track is.
 
txchemist said:
Oh Kinser!- you just triggered an automatic story from my old brain with the term "Hydrogen embrittlement" Many years ago they had a big photo op with the Governor of Iowa driving off in a new Chrysler with one of the first catalytic converters. He went barreling down an old road between the large dry cornfields while everyone clapped. Then the car backfired, and the exploding gas blew the converter into hot parts that caught both sides of the road on fire. Luckily no one was injured. Every company that had a part on that car got it back to do testing on to see if they were the problem. Everyone sent back a report that they were not the problem. And at the time, I was sure I wasn't the problem either- the ignition device I made worked just fine. The converter had other problems that kept the cornfield fire off the radar, but as the months went by with no obvious cause we were all asked to study the problem again. I put the part through some military type vibration testing and oops- the device was intermittent. As soon as the part was still, it passed any test- but if it got a shake just right, it would go open for a while and then start to work again. Just like turning off the engine, coasting a bit and turning it back on to get a nice backfire ( we are talking 1975 or so). The metalization on the semiconductor had layers of titanium, tungsten, and nickle. They found hydrogen embrittlement in the layers causing them to give up adhesion and go intermittent. ( and probably caused the backfire) We had to put in a super hard test for adhesion { Duck Tape- I kid you not}, and we scrapped out the contaminated metal slugs we used. I took them all home and later used the tungsten to put in our first car in 1976. When we asked if turning off the ignition, coasting and then turning it back on would blow it up, They were sure it would even it it never came back on because if a chug of gas got into that 900 degree converter- trouble. Back to the drawing board for them also.

Your cool stories are totally wasted on us TX.

In the immortal words of Todd Beamer

"LET"S ROLL"

Amazing coincidence!
My friend stopped over my workshop with a girlfriend of his today. At first I was a little irritated because I was watching the race.

She had a friend on flight 93 whose name is on the memorial at the World Trade center, and she will pay her respects tomorrow since she is only visiting.
My shop is 5 blocks from the World Trade so it isn't the first time this has happened.

His name was Mark Bingham. The guy with Todd Beamer that was credited with leading the charge that coined the phrase "Let's Roll".
He sounded like a helluva guy from the stories she told.
 
txchemist, Did you work on or with the Lean Burn systems Chrysler had around those times? Diagnosing troubles with them was interesting to say the least. It was basically a look into the future of things to come. Diagnostics today aren't all that different than they were back then.
 
IAE Racing said:
Unless you were being sarcastic Laser, Not true. Story tell away! Thanks for sharing TX!
Oh darn. Did I omit a smiley again?
 
GravityX- Can't remember, but since this was part of a big pollution reduction program, probably.
Automotive had there way of getting your attention. Military had some fast moves also. It is unbelievable how many things were discovered in our automotive and early aerospace quality control that got forgot, watered down, and then appeared 20 years later in Japan as they "discover" high quality. I'm on my soap box now, I'll tell you a true true thing. If you study the average number of mistakes per million that the average American worker makes ( or used to make), it is much lower than the average worker in Japan. When they started out to do knock offs, the quality was much worse- they were following the specs perfectly but they had more errors. Over the years, they had to invent ( or re-invent) ways to reduce human error in manufacturing because they were really bad at it. Once they got rolling, it became the way to pass us up in quality, but many companies in the US are even better.
 
wesley's tire cleaner is unbelievable on anything! Has a very mild acid, will make it bright and shiney! I use it on my Aluminum Mags many times a year!

Ice