Cars sped up question

Ok, so if you were on BASX 2.4g wheels but with graphite and BSA speed axles, look at the times the Pure Stock cars ran on the same track the day before. Faster cars were 2.920's. They had stock wheel bases 7/8" from the rear and the same wheels but on oil, no fenders, and no shields. Add about .025-.035 to the times since you were on graphite and had slightly smaller diameter axles most likely. You already found that increasing steer an inch didn't drastically pick up your times. Check B_Regal's point 8- Do you have a dial caliper to measure your axle diameter? Is there a chance your axles may have become "over polished"? BSA Speed axles are larger than stock but smaller than what most guys run when it's allowed. Measure an unpolished axle and compare to the part you worked. If it's more than maybe .001" difference it probably hurt you a little. Front axle bend too far into the wheel? It'll bind in the bore if it is. If you think it might be, polish a spare axle, bend it clear of the bore, and try it. If you hold the car level in the air and just eyeball the rear wheels do they appear to "hang" straight or do you see any obvious toe in or out looking from the top down? I know you used a quality jig to drill but some pieces of wood are just ornery and don't take a good drill. If you can see obvious toe, that can cost you a little speed. Maybe .005, maybe .010 if it's horrid. Was the thin body lightened? Did you cover any holes? What about the wheels bores? Like the axles, they can be overworked and enlarged. What about wheel gaps? Were you running wheel gaps that were too loose or too tight? Too loose can induce wobbles, too tight will bind the wheel. The more wheel bore to axle clearance you have, the more wheel gap you need to keep from binding the wheel when it's loaded and running. Few thousandths either way, true, but if you're on the wrong side of the tolerance then it's a time suck. I'll +1 also on what TRE and B_Regal said about the extra weight, don't worry about the cube between but do make sure the rear axle spar is solid. My son used a 1/4 x 1/2 x 1 1/2 solid block glued in the rear (equivalent to 12 cubes) and did well. You can always tune with a plate underneath later.
Sorry this got so wordy! lol
 
I am beginning to think I should have gone with the standard 12 cubes in the back "cause it is faster" instead of seeing if something is better. However I built this car to learn and think that with the immense help here I will be better for it.
I do not have a digital caliper so it will be added to the list. As far as the axle diameters I will measure and see. I usually polish for 15 sec at each grit and this time I went to 12K so there maybe some influence.
The DFW axle was bent by John and was probably 3 degrees. I didn't alter that. Maybe I will just for more learning.
The body was 10 grams and I know that I could get lighter with some additional practice.
My gaps were pretry tight and was just wide enough to prevent rub.
I covered the bottom with hvac tape so no holes but my kids always paint their cars vs a smoother finish and figure this may need to be addressed down the road.

As you can see I like wordy too so no worries.
 
If you had the body down to 10g I still think you had something else going on. My son's car was 10g also before he added the balsa fenders. It might be a good idea to build a new body and transfer your parts to see if it helps? If it doesn't, then try replacing one thing at a time ( DFW axle, rear axles, wheels) until it picks up?
 
Imo....the cut rear axle = bad....
The inconsistent times from second run to fourth runs dont show a constant increase in speed...looks like too loose in the rears, sucking air in traffic, and weak steer.....but I do know due to a split rear axle....rebuild. Thats what I do .
 
BTW...if it is consistently speeding up? Maybe a better burnish with graphite and work in before the race....I know how far behind a few hundreds is and how it looks, but Im drinking milk and the kool aid see you on the hill