laserman said:
What one would like to acheive is laminate air flow over the car and avoid turbulent separation. Apparently separation of the boundary layer is a source of major drag. Once the air is separated from the object it can actually reverse direction and cause additional drag. The car really wants to disturb as little air as possible. It wants to cut thru the air and have the air rejoin at the rear of the car.
Here are some pictures of objects that may help define what Joe is saying here. The flat square creates a high amount of air separation and turbulence and actually creates a suction. An common example of this is the snow piling up on the rear of the car while driving on a snow covered road, covering the taillights and such.
Obviously the airfoil or wing design is the most efficient out of the three shown here. The wheels share both the sphere and square shape. The side view of the wheel represents the sphere from a 2 dimensional view, in a top view you see the square/rectangle shape. Add the two and you get a 3 dimensional view of the wheel with combined airflow.
The cars ride fairly close together on the track. I'm sure, to a certain degree, the car give off a wake that
could disturb the car next to it. How much the car next to it is disturbed by this wake it dependent on design, I would think. But weight balance in the car could play a part in preventing this from happening too, again making an assumption. Wind tunnel testing anyone??? But his would only check air flow over the design and would not consider the weight.
Just thinking out loud.