BulldogRacing said:
Holy Cow! I feel like I'm back in a introduction to debate class. I'm going to comment on this from my blue collar construction remodel back ground. I have had 15 years experience bidding remodel work and kitchen and bathroom work. In about 5 min I can evaluate how a customer will be to work with on a project from concept to completion. If I were to spend 5 min in V.K's living room discussing a project I think I would run from the job. Dude, you scare the crap out of me. You sound like the most legalistic argumentative man I have ever had the displeasure of reading from.
It seems to be a common belief that I argue for the sake of arguing. I don't. I started the thread with an intending purpose and a point to put forth. I'd honestly like to see that point engaged and tested in a civil manner. As an aside, you have written many words about
me, and very few about the points that I put forth.
BulldogRacing said:
I'm not a real well written fellow, and I find myself re reading many of your paragraphs to simply follow the root of the issue. I agree with Derby chip, I think you sound like a politician.
The difference between myself and a politician is that a politician is working to advance themselves, while my primary goal is to advance
ideas that I see as worthy to the hobby. If you have to think of me in these terms, I'd rather be a statesman than a politician. /images/boards/smilies/wink.gif
BulldogRacing said:
Back to my construction experience. I have worked for some people who will argue everything possible. I believe you find pleasure in the attention you receive from this. Every good story needs a villain and I believe you try and fill that role, and I believe you are a great debater. In fact if cars ran on the quality of argument you would kick Bullets butt next month. These same customers who tell me how to do my job better also will argue how a flat head screwdriver is better then a 18 volt lithim Ion Dewalt impact drill with a square drive. many of these same know -it- alls will have half finished duct taped, DIY projects littered through out their homes. The worst ever was a very high educated college professor who knew everything. This man had the least amount of common sense I had ever dealt with. I have heard you reference how expensive things are with great frequency. I feel you are trying to build a car with as little financial investment as possible. I can respect that. I can also attest that you could buy the most expensive tools and parts and still suck at building a fast car. We are supposed to be trying to build cars that compete with the very fastest and best built in the nation! Here at NPWDRL as well as MA's you have kids and dads who have access to the finest tools and talents. You will need to invest much time and much money to be among the best in the nation at damn near anything. PWD is no different. Why must it need to cater to spending a small amount to be competitive. It's o.k that it costs money. Hell, you can build an "out of the parts" car and enter, it's all good. Just don't think you'll be on the first page. A DIY television show will show a full remodel happen in a 30 min segment of T.V. This is false. PWD is a hell of a hard hill to climb. I can't believe the level this thing has pushed me. Dude, quit arguing, be pleasant to others. Some of the nicest guys have reached out to me because I don't act like a know it all. But as I started this rant, I believe you do enjoy the debate and I believe you could argue the fact that the sky aint blue, and you would probably win that argument, but your cars will continue to struggle until you change you attitude. "Attitude is a little thing that makes a big difference."
Okay, let me try to unpack some of this.
I am not anti-tools, nor am I anti-investment. I am opposed, in some cases, to rules that, in my view, are antithetical to the purposes for which they are intended. In this case, I am making the assumption that the purpose of wheel restrictions in a Scouting-level race is to help level the playing field in terms of what sort of modifications can reasonably be done. I am highlighting an area in which I see room for improvement and I am offering a corrective.
Now, there are a few responses to this.
- Ignore it, because you like the rules how they are, and you don't care about what I think. (Perfectly valid)
- Decide that you disagree with my point, and offer a counterpoint. (Also, perfectly valid)
- Decide that I am a troll for bringing it up at all and question my motivations, attitude, mental well-being, chakras, E-meter-readings or whatever. (Not so valid)
Now, in the second case, once you present a counterpoint to my arguments, then I can examine your counterpoints and either agree with them, or point out any logical flaws that I happen to see. This is how debate works. This is how ideas are tested, refined and developed. This is how civilization advances.
Nobody is forced to participate in, or to continue a debate. If you have a reasonable response that actually engages with the points that I've made, I want to read it. Not because I thrive on the debate, but because I want to see the idea carried to its full conclusion.
You've made a lot of assumptions about me in your post, but you've said absolutely nothing about the actual topic for which I made the thread.