V
Vitamin K
Guest
This question is broken out from a different thread, but I thought it was worthy of its own.
This past thread was the starting point.
Basically, I'm wondering if I don't need to narrow the front end of a rail-runner car. The referenced thread seems to indicate that if the DFW is canted enough (7+(!) degrees?), there's no need to narrow the DFW side to insure that your rears stay off of the track.
So, I'd like to hear from you pros:
- Do you still narrow your front ends?
- How much do you recommend canting your DFW axle?
- Any good way to test that the car is going to keep the rears off the rail with a given alignment? Without a test track, that is.
- Any 'gotchas' I should know about if I attempt to build a RR car without a narrowed front end?
It is particularly relevant to me, because our rules, if interpreted strictly and unfavorably, could prohibit a body width, at the axles, of less than 1.75". I could probably do it anyhow, and I doubt it would be an issue, but if I don't have to, I'd prefer not to.
This past thread was the starting point.
Basically, I'm wondering if I don't need to narrow the front end of a rail-runner car. The referenced thread seems to indicate that if the DFW is canted enough (7+(!) degrees?), there's no need to narrow the DFW side to insure that your rears stay off of the track.
So, I'd like to hear from you pros:
- Do you still narrow your front ends?
- How much do you recommend canting your DFW axle?
- Any good way to test that the car is going to keep the rears off the rail with a given alignment? Without a test track, that is.
- Any 'gotchas' I should know about if I attempt to build a RR car without a narrowed front end?
It is particularly relevant to me, because our rules, if interpreted strictly and unfavorably, could prohibit a body width, at the axles, of less than 1.75". I could probably do it anyhow, and I doubt it would be an issue, but if I don't have to, I'd prefer not to.