Hello Reggie,
I often use wheel weights . I fully respect the speeds the top racers have achieved, but I am also aware there is a lot of politics in league racing. Because of this I don't generally put a lot of credence in what Pro racers are using at any given time. If you take DWS fenders for example, just a few months ago they would garner snickers from most top racers, but after a few wins they are getting copied by nearly everyone, does that mean X3 fenders are now junk science ?....of course not. Some time back wheel weights and Nellie Faye fenders dominated, times change, Pinewood politics change, but physics do not.
Wheel weights offer a quantifiable advantage over traditional weighting.
1. Puma Cub weights are positioned extremely low on the car body, this lowers the cars COG, resulting in a more stable car. An inherently more stable car needs less steer, less steer = faster times.
2. The lowered weight also gives a slightly larger motor compared to traditional weight located at the same area of the car. The same weight hanging below the car, is a bigger motor than the weight in the car, which in turn is a bigger motor than the weight on top of the car. This is true for all tracks that have an incline followed by level sections.
3. Wheel weights allow you to concentrate weight in a smaller longitudinal area on the car, this results in a lower rotational MOI , and less work for the car as it transitions through the curve. A tungsten plate running across the car, is slightly more effective than the same plate running the length of the car.
Wheel weights might not be for everyone, but they are very effective when done correctly. Their effectiveness is not based on their designers personality, but on sound science.